LexisNexis
  • world mapContact Us
 


Welcome to the LexisNexis Practical Guidance blog. This blog is dedicated to providing training tips, commentary and other relevant information for our new solution, LexisNexis Practical Guidance.

We invite you to "comment" on our blog, tell us what you think about LexisNexis Practical Guidance and to ask us questions about the service.

It's an open forum to share your ideas with LexisNexis, your colleagues and your peers.

This blog is moderated so you won't see your comments straight away; but they should be live within the hour.

You can find out more about the product at www.lexisnexis.com.au/practicalguidance.

Happy blogging!


Negotiating parenting arrangements after separation or divorce

by fiona.tulloch 28. January 2011 12:23

By Annette Wilson, Swaab Attorneys

In brief - Emotions can cloud judgement
 
The biggest mistake that people make when negotiating parenting arrangements is that they allow their own anger and hurt to cloud their judgment as to what parenting arrangements would be in the best interests of their children.

Best interests of the child

The Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) stipulates that the best interests of the child are the paramount consideration when deciding on any parenting orders. When considering this, in most cases, parents should consider an arrangement which promotes stability and regularity for the children and allows them to maintain a relationship with both parents.

Importance of children’s interests

In 2006 the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) was changed and one of the important changes was to strengthen the importance of children’s interests.

It sets out clearly that children have a right to:

• A meaningful relationship with both parents
• Be protected from abuse, neglect and family violence
• Receive adequate and proper parenting to help them achieve their full potential
• Know and be cared for by both parents
• Spend time with and communicate with both parents and any other significant people such as grandparents and other relatives
• Receive the support and encouragement necessary to maintain a connection with their culture

Time with each parent

There is a misconception about the changes to the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) and the concepts of shared time and substantial and significant time. The Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) does not require that children spend the same amount of time with each parent. The important thing is that parents have an arrangement which promotes the best interests of their particular children, keeping in mind that each child is different. This may mean the same amount of time with each parent or something different.

Determining the child’s best interests

What will be in the best interests of a child would be determined by their personality, age, activities and health, amongst other things. Usually it is the parents who are best able to decide what the best parenting arrangements for their children are. To do this the parents must be able to look past their own needs and hurt feelings.

Additional information on negotiating parenting arrangements can be found on the website of the Family Law Courts.

For more information on this article please contact the author:

Annette Wilson, Special Counsel, Swaab Attorneys
Phone: + 61 2 9233 5544
Email: amw@swaab.com.au

 

Tags: , , , , , ,



Disclaimer

LexisNexis, and the authors and endorsers of this blog each exclude liability for loss suffered by any person resulting in any way from the use of, or reliance on, the content of the blog. Views expressed in blog content are the opinion of the individual writer and do not represent the views of LexisNexis.

Page List

    Calendar

    <<  June 2013  >>
    MoTuWeThFrSaSu
    272829303112
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
    1234567

    View posts in large calendar

    RecentComments

    Comment RSS

    TextBox